keeping children safe in education 2024

Learning & Education Hub

5 Key Updates in Keeping Children Safe in Education 2024 (UK Edition)

Keeping Children Safe in Education 2024 outlines the major policy updates introduced by the UK Department for Education, helping schools and colleges strengthen safeguarding and staff training practices.

One in ten schools reported a major policy update after the statutory guidance was revised, underlining the scale of change leaders must grasp.

The guide sets the scene for leaders and DSLs in England. It explains who should read Part One and how the document underpins legal duties to keep every pupil protected.

These safeguarding frameworks are closely connected to modern education ecosystems like Education City, which integrate technology, innovation and safety within UK campuses.

This introduction summarises five headline updates: wording on abuse, a greater emphasis on early help and attendance, cautious gender-questioning advice, duties for alternative provision, and clearer digital safety and data rules.

The 2024 version largely refines wording rather than overhauls process, while the next version signals technical edits and potential future shifts linked to wider inquiries and legislation.

This Ultimate Guide focuses on digital safety (filtering, monitoring and UK GDPR), staff training, and policy alignment so schools can act efficiently and sustain a strong safeguarding culture.

Key Takeaways

Statutory guidance applies to England and sets legal duties for schools and colleges.
All staff should read Part One to understand core responsibilities.
Five headline updates simplify terminology and sharpen early help and attendance focus.
Digital safety and UK GDPR compliance are top priorities for policy revision.
The guide allows proportionate, practical adjustments without disrupting core practice.

Why this Ultimate Guide matters for UK schools and colleges

Understanding the revised guidance helps leaders focus effort where it truly reduces risk and improves practice.

The Department for Education is clear: every member of staff should read Part One to grasp baseline duties. This version highlights digital safety, timely training and tightened compliance steps that leaders must prioritise first.

Prioritise policies: leaders should align wording so governance and staff share the same understanding of protection and early help.
Target effort: concentrate on digital controls, routine safeguarding practice and accurate record-keeping to reduce the biggest risks.
Prepare staff: reading Part One gives staff baseline knowledge while leaders and DSLs translate requirements into clear actions across settings.

Precise wording changes affect inspection evidence and operational readiness. Taking a structured approach now makes future version transitions quicker and less disruptive, and it delivers more consistent responses for children through better attendance conversations and safer online environments.

What stayed the same in KCSIE 2024

Many operational routines stay the same, which helps schools focus on new priorities rather than full policy rewrites.

Key statutory parts retained their wording. Part Three on safer recruitment was left unchanged. Existing selection, vetting and single central record practices continue to be the benchmark.

Where continuity matters

Part Four remains stable. Allegations and low‑level concerns keep the same reporting lines, thresholds and governance steps. Schools can keep current flowcharts and staff briefings with routine checks.

Part Five only adjusted paragraph 497 to mirror updated Working Together wording. That tweak keeps the response to child‑on‑child incidents aligned with early help principles without shifting core practice.

Maintain routine quality assurance for recruitment files and the single central record.
Keep refresher scenarios so staff spot and report concerns quickly.
Audit Parts Three to Five to verify documentation and staff confidence.

The 2024 updates are mostly textual edits rather than radical changes. DSLs and administrators can therefore target effort to the sections that did change, while preserving strong, established systems for allegations, recruitment and escalation.

The five most important changes schools must action from keeping children safe in education 2024

This part summarises five practical updates that schools must implement without delay. Each change adjusts wording or duties that affect policy, training and daily practice.

1. Abuse, neglect and exploitation — wording and practice

The phrase “abuse and neglect” is now “abuse, neglect and exploitation” across Parts One and Two (see paragraphs 19, 66, 202 and Annex A). Schools should update policy headings and staff slides so exploitation risks — criminal and sexual exploitation — are explicit.

2. Early help and attendance language

Early help now highlights multiple suspensions and risk of permanent exclusion (paragraph 18). Absence wording changes from “deliberately missing education” to “unexplainable and/or persistent absences”.

Pastoral teams must revise attendance scripts and referral prompts to trigger timely multi‑agency conversations.

3. Guidance on LGB or gender questioning pupils

Paragraphs 205–209 set a cautious, case‑by‑case approach for pupils who are LGB or gender questioning. Staff should consider the full range of needs and involve parents unless this would create significant risk of harm.

4. Alternative provision duty

New paragraph 171 clarifies that when a school places a pupil with an alternative provision, the school remains responsible for safeguarding. Leaders must evidence due diligence that the provider meets the pupil’s needs and has robust arrangements.

5. Domestic abuse wording and practical steps

Domestic abuse now explicitly notes when a pupil may see, hear or experience its effects. This strengthens assessment prompts and early help planning.

Immediate admin tasks: update policy language, tweak DSL templates, amend induction slides and add training scenarios that integrate exploitation risks, persistent absence casework and sensitive parental engagement for gender questioning cases.

Governors: sample AP placement files and request assurance on how new language is embedded daily.
Training: include digital safety and staff competency checks alongside the new wording to ensure consistent practice.

Digital safety and data protection: filtering, monitoring, and compliant information handling

Digital controls and data routines are now central to daily safeguarding tasks across classrooms and networks.

Schools must join technical management with clear human decisions. That means naming who decides on filters, who monitors logs, and how staff escalate worries. Clear roles reduce delay and show inspectors that governance is active.

Clarifying roles for filtering and monitoring

Responsibilities should state who approves filter changes, who reviews alerts, and how referrals reach the DSL. Regular checks ensure controls work for both curriculum use and child protection.

Using DfE data protection guidance to meet UK GDPR duties

Paragraph 93 directs schools to the department education data protection guidance. Schools should map data flows, minimise collection and keep retention schedules. A DPIA is recommended for any platform that processes pupil information.

Documenting DSL decisions and rationales

DSLs must record discussions and rationales (see Annex C). Notes should explain why a referral was or was not made, consent steps, and professional judgement used.

“Documented decisions provide a clear audit trail that links technical evidence to safeguarding choices.”

Practical artefacts include a filtering policy, an asset register, scheduled checks, and a termly report to governors. Staff micro-briefings should cover online harms and lawful handling of digital evidence.

Area	Who	Action	Evidence
Filtering policy	Head/IT lead	Approve and review termly	Signed policy, review log
Monitoring alerts	Designated monitor/DSL	Investigate and escalate within 24 hrs	Incident log, timestamps
Data protection	DPO / SLT	Map flows, run DPIA for new platforms	DPIA documents, retention schedule
Access controls	IT manager	Test role permissions termly	Access audit, test records

Align incident playbooks so IT, safeguarding and data protection responses are coordinated.
Ensure only authorised adults access sensitive records and follow subject access request processes.
Report termly to governors with anonymised trends and improvements.

Staff training: updating knowledge, delivery methods, and measuring outcomes

Training should bridge policy language and frontline practice, so staff act with confidence. This section sets out the essential updates, modern delivery options and simple ways to test competence.

What staff need to know now

Priority content must include the revised terminology “abuse, neglect and exploitation”, triggers for early help such as multiple suspensions and persistent absence, and recognition when a pupil sees, hears or experiences domestic abuse.

Flexible training delivery

Blend formats to suit busy timetables: workshops for depth, micro-learning for rapid refreshers, short videos and audio briefings for on-the-go access. Scenario practice should cover attendance conversations, gender-questioning cases and alternative provision oversight.

Assessing knowledge, not attendance

Leaders should measure outcomes through quizzes, case reviews and brief assessments mapped to safeguarding competencies. Keep an evidence pack of plans, materials, results and actions taken where gaps appear.

“Assess knowledge and decision-making, not just presence at a session.”

Include Part One essentials in induction and timely refreshers.
Use monthly five-minute micro-lessons and end-of-term pulse checks to save time.
Ensure one-click reporting and easy access to key guidance and thresholds.

Policy and compliance checklist for schools, colleges, and DSLs

This checklist gives governors, leaders and DSLs a practical route for updating policies and showing compliance.

Core wording and statutory alignment

Update all child protection and safeguarding policies to use the phrase “abuse, neglect and exploitation” across annexes, staff guides and induction packs.

Data protection and statutory references

Signpost DfE data protection guidance (paragraph 93) and add a brief summary of UK GDPR and DPA duties for record handling and retention.

Alternative provision and domestic abuse

Include the AP clause from paragraph 171, stating the school retains safeguarding responsibility and must evidence due diligence.

Add domestic abuse wording that notes when a pupil may see, hear or experience its effects so staff can recognise and record risks accurately.

DSL recording and governance checks

Require DSLs to record decisions and rationales per Annex C, including when referrals are not made.

Termly policy review and sample case file audits.
AP provider assurance checks and management oversight routes for reported concerns.
Clear signposts to further guidance and named responsibilities for senior leaders.

Keep policy language concise and practical: state routes for action, responsibilities and where staff find key information quickly.

Timeline and what’s next: preparing for September and the 2025 version

Start with a small action log and termly checkpoints to make future technical edits straightforward. A modest readiness plan reduces pressure and preserves leadership time.

Plan now for september 2025. Embed the September 2024 wording across policy, training and AP checks today. Schedule a mid‑year review and keep an evidence pack that shows decisions, dates and outcomes.

Planning ahead amid technical 2025 updates and emerging national learnings

Track official announcements from the department education so the senior team can act quickly when the next version is published.

Governors should set termly policy checkpoints and confirm AP due diligence. Use a simple dashboard to record progress on staff competency, filtering, monitoring and access controls.

Maintain a live action log and evidence pack for audits.
Test business continuity each term: platform access, backups and escalation routes.
Coordinate updates centrally for multi‑site settings, with local addenda where needed.

“A short readiness dashboard helps leaders brief stakeholders and keep momentum as national findings and technical changes arrive.”

Conclusion

, This final paragraph pulls the key obligations together so leaders can act with clarity and pace.

Adopt the revised wording—notably “abuse, neglect and exploitation”—and reinforce early‑help prompts, cautious handling of gender‑questioning cases, and AP due diligence. DSLs must record rationales clearly to create a defensible information trail.

Prioritise digital safety: name who manages filtering and monitoring, follow DfE data guidance and audit access controls. Pair policy updates with a pragmatic training plan that measures knowledge, not just attendance.

Finish wording changes, brief staff, test workflows and run a short data and records audit. These modest updates sharpen safeguarding practice and support keeping children safe as the next version arrives.

Finish wording changes, brief staff, test workflows and run a short data and records audit. These modest updates sharpen safeguarding practice and support keeping children safe as the next version arrives. For full statutory guidance and downloadable resources, visit the UK Government Department for Education.

FAQ

What are the five key updates in Keeping Children Safe in Education 2024 (UK edition)?

KCSIE 2024 introduces five core shifts: expanding wording from “abuse and neglect” to “abuse, neglect and exploitation”; stronger emphasis on early help and clearer attendance language for persistent or unexplained absence; updated guidance on pupils who are LGB or questioning their gender, favouring cautious, case‑by‑case support; reinforced duties for schools that place pupils in alternative provision; and clearer expectations for digital safety, filtering and monitoring. These changes affect policy wording, staff training and record keeping.

Why does this guide matter for schools and colleges in the UK?

The guide helps leaders, designated safeguarding leads (DSLs) and governors translate statutory expectations into practical steps. It highlights required policy updates, clarifies responsibilities under Working Together and the Department for Education guidance, and supports consistent safeguarding practice across settings. Staying current reduces risk, improves responses to concerns and ensures compliance with UK GDPR when handling sensitive information.

Which parts of KCSIE 2024 remain largely unchanged?

Several core areas keep their established framework: safer recruitment checks and practices; managing allegations against staff; and approaches to child‑on‑child abuse retain minimal substantive change. Schools should keep existing robust procedures but ensure terminology aligns with the 2024 wording where needed.

What practical actions must schools take for the change to “abuse, neglect and exploitation”?

Update policy language across Part One and Part Two documents, refresh staff briefing materials and include exploitation in risk assessments. DSLs should check referral thresholds with local authorities and ensure multi‑agency links reflect the broader risks of exploitation, including county lines and online grooming.

How should attendance and early help changes influence day‑to‑day practice?

Schools should revise absence monitoring triggers to capture persistent or unexplainable non‑attendance, escalate earlier to pastoral teams and consider early help when thresholds are met. Clear recording and prompt multi‑agency liaison are essential to prevent escalation and to demonstrate timely action.

What guidance is given about pupils who are LGB or questioning their gender?

KCSIE 2024 advises a cautious, case‑by‑case approach that centres the pupil’s welfare and safety. Staff must balance confidentiality with safeguarding duties, involve parents and specialists as appropriate, and avoid blanket policies. Training should cover respectful language, mental‑health indicators and managing disclosures.

How does alternative provision affect a school’s safeguarding duty?

Schools retain safeguarding responsibility for pupils placed in alternative provision. They must carry out due diligence on providers, agree clear communication and reporting arrangements, and ensure that safeguarding policies and DSL oversight continue to operate effectively for those pupils.

What are the updated expectations for digital safety and monitoring?

Schools must demonstrate effective filtering and monitoring that balance safety and access to learning. Record decisions about configurations, explain mitigations for false positives and negatives, and use Department for Education and ICO guidance to align practice with UK GDPR. DSLs should document rationales for monitoring choices.

How should DSLs document decisions about online incidents and data handling?

DSLs should record the incident, the information considered, the rationale for action, who was consulted and the outcome. Records must be secure, proportionate and retained in line with data‑protection guidance. Clear documentation strengthens decision‑making evidence for audits and multi‑agency reviews.

What do staff need to know now about terminology and emerging risks?

Staff should be familiar with updated terms such as “exploitation” alongside abuse and neglect, recognise domestic abuse impacts on pupils, and understand early‑help pathways. Training should include how to spot online harms, grooming, peer exploitation and attendance‑related risks.

What flexible training methods best support staff competence?

Blend whole‑staff briefings, targeted workshops, micro‑learning modules and multimedia refreshers. Use case studies and short assessments to check understanding. Evidence of competence should focus on demonstrated knowledge and decision‑making, not just attendance records.

How should schools assess whether training has been effective?

Use short knowledge checks, scenario‑based assessments and audits of record quality. Review referral rates, timeliness of responses and staff confidence surveys. Triangulate data from incidents, safeguarding logs and external reviews to measure impact.

What are the key policy updates for the compliance checklist?

Update child protection and safeguarding policies with clear wording on exploitation, attendance triggers, alternative provision responsibilities and digital safety. Align references to Working Together, KCSIE sections and statutory guidance. Ensure contact lists, DSL roles and reporting routes are current.

How should governors and leaders prepare for September and beyond?

Leaders should schedule policy reviews, refresh governor briefings, complete staff training updates and test data‑protection measures before term starts. Plan for the technical 2025 update by tracking DfE consultations and emerging national learnings to adapt policy and practice promptly.

Where can schools find authoritative guidance and templates?

Refer to the Department for Education’s KCSIE statutory guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children, ICO resources on data protection and local safeguarding partner procedures. Many local authorities and safeguarding partnerships publish templates and checklists that align to regional processes.

How should schools handle disclosures that involve domestic abuse or exploitation?

Prioritise the pupil’s immediate safety, follow the school’s safeguarding procedures, record details factually and make timely referrals to children’s services or the police when thresholds are met. Liaise with multi‑agency partners and consider early help where appropriate to reduce harm.

What record‑keeping practices strengthen safeguarding compliance?

Keep concise, dated records that capture decisions, evidence and chronology. Store records securely, limit access, and ensure transfer protocols for pupils moving between settings. Periodic audits help detect gaps and demonstrate readiness for external inspection.